|
|
Title: BIO-ETHICS Cloning & Stem
Cell Research
Volume 22 Issue 1 Summer 2003 |
| # |
Article
Description |
Author |
| 1 |
Animal Rights
in the Light of Animal Cognition
Introduction -
The issue as to whether animals have rights (or indeed
other forms of moral standing) is a complex, divisive
issue that is apt to generate much heated argument.
While there are many reasons for this unhappy state
of affairs, I believe that in Western cultures at
least, a fundamental underlying reason has to do with
the fact that the issue of the moral status of nonhuman
animals is inextricably intertwined with some issues
of long standing concerning the relative positions
of humans and nonhuman in nature. In medieval,
these matters were informed by a fundamentally theological
perspective; human and nonhuman animals were viewed
as having been created by God to occupy different
positions in the grand scheme of the universe.
Inspired by Biblical tradition and ancient Greek philosophy,
notably that of Aristotle, medieval thinkers saw nonhuman
animals as creatures placed here for our use. |
Niall Shanks |
| 2 |
Cloning Me, Cloning
You: Reflections on the Ethics of Cloning for Individuals,
Families and Society
Introduction -
With the unconfirmed news that at least two human
clones have been born, what are the ethical implications
of human cloning for individuals, family and society?
How should we begin to decipher pros and cons of this
technology? This paper concentrates on the ethics
of cloning a human being for the purposes of producing
a child or children in a family. There is not
the scope to deal with the moral issues surrounding
the use of embryo stems cells for therapeutic cloning
which may result in the growth of specific organs
or tissues. The paper begins with a layperson's
understanding of the science of cloning, before addressing
a couple of common myths that are associated with
this technology. then there is a brief outline
of the major philosophical arguments for and against
cloning. To examine the ethical implication,
I use a scenario based upon the reproductive needs
and desires of a heterosexual couple and a lesbian
couple. Through an exploration of the issues
arising from the scenario, there will be an examination
of the relevance of the arguments for and against
proceeding with this technology. As we shall
see, not all reasons put forward for and against coloning
are ethical reasons. |
Alix Magney |
| 3 |
Stem Cells -
A Beginner's Guide
Introduction -
The promise of the new "stem cell" biology
is that it is hoped that one day these cells might
be used to replaced parts of human body lost through
injury or disease. It may be possible for humans
to grow new parts, just as lizards grow new tails
or amphibians, new legs. Transplanting bone
marrow stem cells to replace those lost in cancer
therapy is already clinical practise and clinical
trials are underway to repair the heart using these
cells. The creations of new pancreatic cells
for diabetes is under intensive research in animal
studies, and treatments for brain diseases such as
Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease are though
possible. These development in biotechnology
promise great advances in human ailments, but at the
same time raise challenging ethical dilemmas for society.
In this paper some of the terminology of stem cell
is presented and the biology of these cells is introduced.
The focus here is therefore not on the ethical issues
explicitly but rather presents the scientific background
to a debate on the ethics of this exciting and rapidly
advancing science. In particular this chapter
introduces the concepts of "embryonic and adult
stem cells" and their therapeutics potential,
both dreamed of and currently embodied. |
Alan Mackay-Sim |
| 4 |
Why it's Wrong
to Experiment on Human Embryos
Introduction -
The Catholic Church teaches that it is
wrong to create and/or destroy human embryos for purpose
of scientific research (for example, to obtain stem
cells). In this essay I reconstruct a path towards
this conclusion by identifying a series of steps,
each of which marks a decisive feature of one's approach
to ethical decision making. Those who reach
a different conclusion will thereby be able (I hope)
to identify the point or points on which our disagreement
is based. In addition, the fundamentals that
needs to be addressed before an ethical consensus
can be reached should have become clear by way of
this approach. |
Gerald Gleeson |
| 5 |
The Moral Status
of the (Spare) Embryos
Introduction -
On 30 May 2002 the Prime Minister of Australia announced
that over forty millions dollars would be devoted
to stem cell research. on 31 May representatives
of the Catholic Church protested that there are still
unresolved moral issues, especially as regards embryonic
stem cell research, and that the allocation of funds
was therefore premature. I agree. I think
that all forms of stem cell research should proceed,
but not before the community has had more time to
discuss the moral issues involved. It has been said
that developments in biotechnology and research in
the life science in general are moving ahead too quickly,
leaving moral and ethical questions in their wake;
stem cells research seems a case in point But that
is not so much because philosophers and other specialists
have not thought about these questions or have nothing
to say about them. it is rather that public understanding
of what is at stake will (almost inevitably) take
longer to evolve and change than does scientific research
- that has been true since the time of Copernicus.
My intention here is therefore to try to clear the
way a little by examining the main objection to embryonic
stem cell research. While some (in fact, increasing
numbers) believe that adult stem cell may be as effective
as embryonic stem cells in treating cellular diseases,
it is generally accepted that opportunities for therapy
will be maximised if research into both types of stem
cell is conducted (see Mackay-Sim's paper in this
journal for all the details). In what follows
I will only be concerned with embryonic stem cells. |
John Forge |
| 6 |
Indigenous Epistemology
and Indigenous Standpoint Theory
Introduction -
Indigenous postgraduate students can become frustrated
by being forced to accept western, ethnocentric research
methodology that is culturally remote and often unacceptable
to the Indigenous epistemological approach to knowledge.
the forceful application of western approaches to
postgraduate study has resulted in numerous Indigenous
Australian students abandoning their dreams of a higher
degree (Budby 2001a). The racial oppression
of Indigenous Australian predagogy and research methodologies
within higher Education institutions needs to be acknowledged
(Budby 2001b), then and only then can Indigenous students
can be given alternatives. The purpose of this
paper therefore is to provide an alternative to what
is currently available. |
Dennis Foley |
| 7 |
"What is
Man?" The Politics of Representing Genetics
Introduction -
In Kant's logic lectures at the University of Konigsberg
(Kant, 1992, p.538), he summed up the meaning of philosophy
for citizens as an attempt to produce a systematic
and unified response to the following questions:
1. What can I know?
2. What ought I to do ?
3. What may I hope?
4. What is Man? |
Alexandra Neame |
|
|
|