|
|
Title: Disability
as Politics
Volume 18 Issue 1 Summer 1999 |
| # |
Article
Description |
Author |
| 1 |
Beyond Goodwill:
The Materialist View of Disability
Introduction -
In recent years there has been a decline in support
amongst theorists, activists and policy makers for
individualised, medicalised accounts of disability
in favour of various social models. There have been
many critiques in recent years levelled against the
medical explanations of disability that informed law
and institutional practice in Western countries until
recent decades. The medical model alleges that disability
is sourced in individual 'deficiencies' or physical
'abnormalities'.
|
Brendan Gleeson |
| 2 |
Living Disability:
A Conversation |
Lynne Davis and
Jenny Green |
| 3 |
Superchicks,
clones, cyborgs, and cripples: cinema and messages
of bodily transformation
Introduction -
Hollywood is continually pumping out movies saturated
with images of disability. Sometimes these movies
can tell us more about disability, difference and
what it takes to be a good citizen than some might
ever want to know (Meekosha and Dowse, 1997). In classic
anthropological terms, movies have cultural functions,
and movies about disability are more likely to be
movies about normality and stability and the threat
disability poses (Darke, 1998). Indeed, disability
may be used as a metaphor for threats to the social
order, an issue explored in the Pointon and Davies
volume for the British Film Institute, Framed (1997).
A number of recent films allow us to examine the boundaries
of disability representation in contemporary popular
culture.
|
Helen Meekosha |
| 4 |
Manifesto for
Genetic Justice
Introduction -
As we approach the end of the twentieth century, for
the first time in human history it need no longer
be a problem to be a person with an impairment. At
least in the developed world, we have the medical
skills to prolong life and remove pain and suffering
in most instances. We have welfare states and social
organisations to enable people with illness and impairment
to achieve the same goals as others. We are shifting
our cultural and political understandings to grant
disabled people autonomy, respect and civil rights.
Readers will laugh hollowly, when they compare my
claims with the reality they experience themselves,
but what I am suggesting is that we are getting there.
Things are getting. Utopia is potentially possible.
Disability equality is on ....
|
Tom Shakespeare |
| 5 |
You May But You
Cannot
Introduction -
The beginnings
I should preface the account which
follows by saying that my observations deliberately
focus on a range of difficult experiences. They are
challenging and confronting, and may be experienced
in this way by the reader. I make no apologies for
this. For many disabled people and their carers, such
experiences form a strong and constant part of their
daily lives. Beyond this however, my sons provide
me with immeasurable happiness, and parenting is a
continual source of learning. I am actively involved
in my work as a counsellor and a marriage celebrant
and lead a full and active life.
|
Marie Cowling |
| 6 |
J'accuse!: Cultural
Imperialism - Ableist Style
Introduction -
It has become a commonplace to talk about the ways
that capitalism and imperialism have created a cultural
hegemony. Progressives throughout the world are now
familiar with the work of Raymond Williams, Terry
Eagleton, Edward Said, bell hooks, Helene Cixcous,
and others. No one would dispute that women, gays,
subalterns, people of color, and so on have been marginalized
in literary works and the media. But the case of people
with disabilities. is somewhat different. Indeed,
one of the most egregious acts of omission committed
in the twentieth century by progressives and radicals
has been the almost complete ignoring of the issues
surrounding people with disabilities and Deaf people!
An ableist cultural hegemony is clearly the rule,
not only in totalitarian states but in socialist and
progressive states. That the left has not even considered
this form of oppression is a telling mark of shame.
|
Lennard J. Davis |
| 7 |
The Trouble with
Travel: People with Disabilities and Tourism
Introduction -
In 1993, an estimated 3.2 million Australians or 18%
of the population were classified as having a disability
(ABS 1993). These statistics indicate that of this
population 88.9% have some form of physical and non
'mental' disability and for 11.1 % the disability
is 'mental'. In 1985, Durgin, Lindsay and Hamilton,
estimated that 13% of all travellers had some form
of disability and this figure was predicted to rise,
particularly with the ageing of the baby boomers,
advances made in medical science that had become more
adept at saving lives and with greater access to travel
by a range of people. However, people with disabilities
have a significantly different tourism experience
than their fellow Australians (Darcy 1998). Yet, they
have the same expectations and desires to travel as
the rest of the community. So what are the major forms
of social exclusion in tourism, and what are the solutions?
This paper ....
|
Simon Darcy and
Pheroza S. Daruwalla |
| 8 |
Encountering
Oppression: The Emergency of the Australian Disability
Rights Movement
Introduction -
Emerging Consciousness
Can you recall 1981? What are your
memories of that year, and of people with disabilities
in your life? Can you recall that it was the International
Year of Disabled Persons (IYDP)? Many of us with disability,
or those who care for people with disability, remember
that year not in terms of being a private problem
but more a public issue awaiting definition (Borsay,
1986). The recognition, by the state, of issues for
people with disabilities and their carers, and the
provision of resources, played some part in the development
of political consciousness by individuals with disability.
We were developing a social movement and identifying
systemic oppression in our lives.
|
Christopher Newell |
| 9 |
Disability and
Citizenship: making the State accountable
Introduction -
The Constitutional Convention, held in Australia in
1997, provided an opportunity for discussion and debate
about what it means to be a citizen of this country.
However, discussion became focused primarily upon
whether the country should be governed as a constitutional
monarchy, or a republic, and avoided in the main any
scrutiny of the concept of 'citizenship'.
|
Michael Bleasdale
and John Tomlinson |
|
|
|